You have to teach it, and even when you reach the point where the machine understands the task at hand, if you don’t tell it exactly what you want, you’re unlikely to get exactly what you need.
Callaway x hot driver 2019 how to#
It’s not like you flip a switch and the computer knows how to design a golf club – or even what a golf club is. What sometimes gets lost in the excitement of machine learning is that the machine boots up as dumb as a box of rocks. Left to Right: Mavrik, Mavrik Sub Zero, Mavrik Max The Computer Doesn’t Know What it Doesn’t Know So how did Callaway resolve the issues with its 2 nd generation of AI-driven drivers? It turns out that AI is a bit like cowbell sometimes, you just need more. The track weighting system, while versatile, brought a performance compromise.CT Creep (faces getting hotter over time) caused issues between the Callaway Tour staff and the USGA.It was arguably the worst sounding driver on the market.The Flash face was significantly heavier than conventional designs.So, before we dig into the fixes, let’s take a brief moment to list the problems.
So, long story short, Callaway did some cool, potentially ground-breaking things with Epic Flash, but it wasn’t without its issues. A couple of 10ths of a mile per hour may not sound like much, but it’s infinitely more than zero. The point is that, in spite of assertions to the contrary, the gray area between CT and COR provides a legitimate opportunity for incremental (and small) peak ball speed gains within the USGA rules. That’s not to say Callaway has done it, but every club engineer I’ve spoken with agrees that it’s possible – and most acknowledge they’re trying to live somewhere in the space between.įor the sake of clarity – none of this is meant to suggest that 10 more yards is a realistic possibility. The theory is that it’s possible to stay under 257 (the absolute CT limit) while pushing COR above. The reality is that the correlation between CT (the USGA’s current face deflection metric) and COR (the former standard) is not absolute.
Callaway x hot driver 2019 drivers#
Epic Flash RewindĪI was the reason, according to Callaway, that Flash produced more peak (dead nuts center contact) ball speed than other drivers (higher COR), while still staying under the USGA CT limit – most of the time, anyway.īefore we move on, let’s acknowledge that this is exactly the kind of claim golfers who can’t be bothered to understand the physics dismiss out of hand. Fun little fact: it’s not that the guys at Callaway can’t spell (most of them probably can), but working around existing Trademarks sometimes requires a bit of phonetic creativity. The continuation of Callaway’s AI strategy, the Mavrik name serves to convey the message that bringing the product to life required unconventional thinking (and perhaps unconventional spelling). The big selling point, of course, was that Epic Flash was the first driver design powered by AI and machine learning. It didn’t sound good a little pitchy, dog. On Tour, Epic Flash led the league in failed USGA CT Tests, and while it’s purely speculation on my part, likely sent more golfers to the ER with bleeding eardrums than any other 2019-made driver in golf. Epic Flash Sub Zero took home Most Wanted honors, and the standard model wasn’t far behind.Ģ019 was a bad year for Callaway drivers.
Epic Flash was #1 at retail and was the most used driver across all worldwide tours. 2019 was a good year for Callaway drivers.
0 kommentar(er)
